Jurors behavior character analysis from twelve angry men

Juror 12 William Petersen: The jury of twelve retires to the jury room, where they begin to become acquainted with their personalities and discuss the case. Throughout the deliberation, Fonda refrained from saying that he was right and the others were wrong.

Juror Seven is defensive about how fast he voted.

Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men”

Transactional leadership is a two-way social exchange in which there is reciprocal and mutual influence between a leader and the group. An initial vote is taken and eleven of the jurors vote for conviction.

The only dissenters left are Jurors 3, 4, and Robert Webber Well-dressed, easily swayed, smooth-talking business ad man with thick black glasses; uses advertising talk at one point: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene.

Juror Eight responds by asking to see the knife again—the Foreman looks at him questioningly before talking to the guard. It is through this process of sincere listening that members of differing worldviews can begin to build personal relationships that are important during community dialogue Kouzes and Posner, Later, Nine will further discuss the concepts of truths and lies.

As addressed above as isolation from other groups, organizations can be susceptible to unethical decisions based on their inability to create dialogue with impacted stakeholders.

Seven is flighty, and only vaguely interested in the proceedings, which he hopes will end quickly. Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Nine reacts emotionally to the idea that only some people get to define what truth is, or who can be trusted. The Foreman continues that his friend served on a jury where they found the defendant not guilty, but later learned that he really did the murder.

He lashes out against the accused kid because he cannot lash out against his own son from whom he is estranged. The case appears to be open-and-shut: Henry Fonda emerged as a very successful leader because he showed value in others, empathy, seriousness and integrity.

The authority compliance style is described as being task oriented and showing little or no concern for people. This was the least displayed trait of all. When you present your point of view, regardless of the initial support, you will be heard, and you may just be the voice another person needs to hear to speak out against the majority.

In the play, all Reginald Rose wrote was that Juror 3 began to pound on the desk and seemed about to cry. In addition, the hot conditions of the room as well as the time pressures presented from some members created even more stress.

Your IQ does not necessarily reflect an effective leader.

The Role of Group Dynamics: An Analysis of 12 Angry Men

Leaders are defined by two separate characteristics; those who are appointed as the leader and those with no special title that emerge as influential. The window is an innocent object over which the jurors clash. Active Themes Juror Four, now holding the switch knife that has been brought back into the room by the guard, challenges Juror Eight.

The Role of Group Dynamics: An Analysis of 12 Angry Men

He begins to display task-oriented approach by offering up a new idea to the group. His son ran from a fight when he was eight, and his father was ashamed of him.

He was very compassionate, and showed high regard for others as stated earlier. Three claims an interest in the facts, but more often restricts his arguments to verbally supporting Four when he presents facts and logical reasoning.

Dialogue is the only pathway to such a learning process.The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is about twelve male jurors, brought together in a deliberation room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The deliberation starts with an vote for guilty. As the movie progresses, the one man who had a reasonable doubt about the guilt or innocent of the [ ].

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is a film about twelve jurors in a murder trial deliberating the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. All of the jurors come from very different backgrounds and see things in very different perspectives.

In '12 Angry Men' by Reginald Rose, Juror 3 is the most difficult of all of the jurors. In this court-room drama where the life of a teenager is on the line, this lesson will reveal the underlying.

In this lesson we will examine Juror 12 and his character in ''12 Angry Men''. We will see how his peacemaking and wishy-washy nature affect the.

Twelve Angry Men Film. BUS Organizational Behavior - 12 Angry Men Analysis The film 12 Angry Men is about a group of twelve jurors who are brought together to decide the fate of a minority teenage boy accused of stabbing his father to death. It is a hot day in New York City which adds to the tension that builds up between the jurors in the small deliberation room.

LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twelve Angry Men, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.

12 Angry Men Critical Analysis Essay Sample

Reflection of American Society Justice.

Jurors behavior character analysis from twelve angry men
Rated 4/5 based on 33 review